first or mood rider? "The SPD chairman (Sigmar Gabriel) will resolve the dispute over the rail project but with a separate referendum. The mass protest against Stuttgart 21 is" a signal of distrust against the policy. "Why was a new political culture necessary for the citizens with elements of direct democracy be involved using. Only a referendum on the project succeed, it could, "the gulf between rulers and ruled" reduce. "We need additional legitimacy."
this sounds but sometimes close to the people. Sigmar Gabriel as a pioneer in the struggle for more trust politicians! Sensational.
we examine the individual statements but sometimes and start times in the definition of foreign words.
Ligitimation (from Latin: lex, legis = "Law", "justification"). Ie Mr. Sigmar Gabriel called "additional laws." Ah ha, we learn: "Dead, dead on the dead, most legal, lawful, legitimate at the most ...
Mr. Gabriel spent here a little linguistic trick in which he summarily absolute adjective "legitimate, lawful," transforms into the class of increases to adjectives. Thus suggertiert, you could be a legitimate projects, decided to make more lawful than it already is.
But let us once the instrument of the referendum on.
Here there 2 options. In one case, one needs the signatures of 1.25 million voters in Baden-Wurtemberg state parliament. The even the SPD considers it a bad idea if you make instead an absurd proposal.
The government of Badem-Wuerttemberg but a phase-out legislation on the path, then that of the government and the SPD is abgeleht so then a referendum can be held over the phase-out legislation.
In other words, the state government of Badem-Württemberg your law for the exit, you will not refuse to be a referendum rejects the non-exit.
Excuse me?
Similarly, the SPD could also God of creation require a subsequent Anspassung. For me, this is an absurd chicanery. In the least but it is a very questionable legal interpretation.
Let 's look back to the objectives of the SPD, which you follow with the referendum, namely the requirement for "additional laws."
, it raises two questions:
1) Can one of absurd / questionable claim or legal interpretation "more laws" can be achieved?
2) Is Sigmar Gabriel, the leader in the fight for greater confidence in the policy or simply the rider of the Mood waves?
