Just today I read an article by the author Couterstrike with the children's game "Cowboys and Indians" compares. The article itself other prepared blunt the "killer game"-waves and is therefore also not surprising to conclude that Cowboy and Indians is much better (which I do not generally dispute), "Killer Games" really bad, and cause besides killing sprees. To clarify the current debate
something occurred to me the following idea ....
- Is "cowboys and Indians" not a game when it comes to shooting, killing, torturing, and bonds (the stake)?
- Cowboys have not committed terrible massacres of Indians?
- Will children with "cowboys and Indians" not trained at an early age in the use of weapons?
- Are not the children of "cowboys and Indians" motivated to kill?
- terrorists have previously played cowboys and Indians!
- Tim K has not played cowboys and Indians as a child!
"Cowboy and Indians! "are responsible for the massacre and terrorism
In truth
" cowboys and Indians was "an al-Qaida terrorist camp sponsored by the CIA
So the children would prefer 12 hours in one piece can Couterstrike play instead! prohibit "Cowboy and Indians" ...
This should be an example of how I can turn with the simple language means cause and effect ....
Note the sequence of words:
shooting, killing, torture , massacres, training, motivation, terrorists, complete with running amok ...
"The truth is ...."
0 comments:
Post a Comment