has just spoken woman Zypries against a ban on the storage of firearms at home . In return, ask now again the first one Ban on "Killer" play .
Is censorship the answer?
If we prohibit certain computer games we have in the same step, of course, also file Horror, action films, certain books, music, websites and toy ban.
way with Lord of the Rings, a soldier named Ryan, Batman the Dark Knight, James Bond, Braveheart, Rammstein, Metallica and the cowboy at Carnival.
If we do as Mr Prof. Dr. Helmut Luke as a reason only the "lack of cultural loss" to the scale, are for me now Rosamunde Pilcher, good times, bad times, Lime Street and the whole folk music to it.
FPS yes I can play for hours without being aggressive. In a Rosamunde Pilcher films in coincidence with "black-brown is the hazelnut" I can not guarantee for more than 10 minutes for me. Measured by the standard
in return, the women are right to demand a ban on the sport show.
And since 80% of all serious injuries and 50% of all take place under the influence of alcohol homicide , we have to ban alcohol. And since, according to the German Cancer Society every day 300 people in Germany die from the effects of smoking cigarettes with the same!
prohibit Next, we again then topless and kissing scene on TV?
Back Prussian virtues?
But what remains for the censorship?
Bible TV and Sesame Street.
16 weapons in the house but game ban?
So the Professor finds it only slightly
".... individual, if the father has stored for 16 guns at home. But that does not equal a lack of parenting skills, which must lead to problems. There are always influences from different perspectives. "
That is, if the son with an unsecured weapon kills 15 people is not an indication of lack of parenting skills and not the prerequisite for such an act. Because it is believed Prof Dr. Luke .... (Reconciliation)
"... strongly that the ideas have a strong power over the people."
And after this profound analysis, he is now the "real" reason the same set ....
" One can think his way into games and videos without having to be pathologically remarkable advance. The gunman apparently was able to shoot well. The motivation to be there. This can be from various sources be nurtured. Since offering the games industry and media world, many things. Example:. Terrorists "
means:. Computer games turn normal people into madmen and terrorists shooting one learns far more with the gun in his hand, but on the computer, the computer game as a motivational speaker for madmen and terrorists
interesting realization!. but only shows that the good man never had a gun in his hand. If we have a look at the key words of the paragraph ....
"madmen, terrorists, shoot, motivation, cause, computer games,"
recognize that Mr. Luker straight out of a game with 3 sets of an Al-Qaeda Terror camp has made.
But thank God, the Professor also equal to the solution at hand, because ....
"It is not a cultural loss when it disappears and all scrap such computer games are taken off the market. .... There is a great sport or jump-and-run games ,..."
a naive, dangerous statement I think. If this were a scale, would have only 80% of the current television program to be banned immediately. In addition, we would then have someone who says kindly, what is cultural and what is not valuable enough. And we had erst. hies that time it "un-German Surrender all the fire ..." or "prohibition of Western television."
also someone seriously believes he can somebody who can get a weapon like this to hold a computer game to install on his computer??
And who I believe would go into a store to buy me a game? I invite you today just the games on the net or I do I go from Amazon.de Amazon.uk to stop ...
With the same arguments can be the way "prove" that the children's "Cowboys and Indians" responsible for the shooting spree was ....
We turn cause and effect
I suspect that a significant proportion of people with lie gun ownership at home at least one weapon in the bedroom have. If I had arms I'd keep it so that I have them handy when I need it should sometimes ....
But all agree that gun laws should not be tightened.
But why we are now discussing about computer games?
You can see it fine on the change of names.
Games -> Shooter game / Ego-Shooter -> Killer game
And is suddenly no longer the weapon to blame, but the computer game.
The fact is, for most people so incomprehensible that it the apparent reasons are no longer seriously questioned or even constructed like Prof. Dr. reasons. In his search for reasons grabs at a straw man, offering him. The best example of the proliferation of fake Internet message by Baden-Wuerttemberg Interior Minister Heribert Rech
is How to explain such acts quite well
to find an explanation is really not that difficult.
A (congenital) Depression
Our emotions such as fear, sorrow, love, joy, hatred, are fundamental characteristics of being. Only through them that we really feel, that we are alive. A person who is in located in a depression, lives most of the time in an emotionless state. In this state, it simply does not matter whether he lives or not. This can be increased up to the hatred of life. It is a contempt of life.
In my circle I know of including a child who suffers at age 12 from severe bulimia. As a small child striking already in therapy for years, you must now be fed to the probe. She was beaten or abused and they still have other siblings, one of which is otherwise not a single behavioral problems. Without medical help, they would already be dead, you will not live. Therapies in such cases to be limited.
Now it no longer really need much.
a Haßobjekt
Inevitably, each looking into the situation for the reason. Popular human guilt object "are always everyone else." People with depression are necessarily less socially acceptable. The exclusion should not even be actively pursued.
And if I hate my own life and "you" are responsible for my Sitation what I mean as your life?
Now you need "only" ...
a weapon
not work without it
and ....
why we will see another run at a school said
On the day of the massacre me a girlfriend from Peru to the incident and expressed deep regret. Will you try to understand these acts definitively, it is best if you do not ask, as usual, the motives of the perpetrator. Clearly it is when you ask yourself what has achieved the perpetrator to the crime ....
For by all broadcasters and newspapers to bring nationally and internationally for weeks on nothing but the shooting spree, discuss the new policy, laws, and everyone talks about it in the first place, we provide the platform for such acts.
For it is in the actions of only one thing: Once in a lifetime the focus of international public attention.
It is simply a cruel form of Selbstinzenierung. And we are the target audience.
And as long as the audience join in so beautiful, we will often see such killing sprees. Next time probably with even more bloody deaths. I bet soon the first pictures or videos will be made live in a killing spree, appear somewhere on the net.
What distinguishes those who look at documentaries on the massacre or the image acquired by a newspaper Autobahngaffer?
He's not on the highway.
We have now with Big Brother & Co. accustomed to our television in the private life of people want that we do not find it even more unusual when a man on camera shoots .
But from the perspective of those with similar thoughts as the shooter, we do so the gunman as a model, heroes and martyrs. In other words.
* We make ourselves our own madmen
* We are a part of the problem.
As you can see there have been already pretty competitive. Such acts are now intensively planned and prepared. Who has the coolest video of the rampage, who has the coolest outfit who has the most weapons, there are bombs handicrafts, and of course the main question:
solutions
1) A I think would be a useful measure coverage that is limited to the facts. No pictures, no cover, no detailed reports, no documentation, no program changes.
could there be given a voluntary undertaking by the media. This could only be difficult for the media in which the stoking fears is at the core of their business model (in my opinion, the best example: Bild-Zeitung).
2) arms are not in private households. The argument put forward by Ms Zypries that the storage of weapons in shooting clubs, they can be interesting and a slump object not understand me. Already stored in every clubhouse enough weapons to equip a small army. Then there must be very strict requirements for the storage of weapons. For fire safety regulations but also HERE.
also of the proposal by Angela Merkel , gun owners in the future to control notice I do not believe. Are we now employ weapons inspectors in 1000, the rumreisen in the Republic and control the correct storage of weapons in private households? We then perform a weapons possession tax must pay one or the majority?
There are also such a thing as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the . Without a court search warrant does not enter a weapons inspector without asking for accommodation. That is, if I had not properly secured my arms, I let the controller do not just clean. End of debate.
3) children's awareness in relation to exclusion. Active exclusion (bullying) should not be tolerated by all in the education of the people involved. But the children should be sensitized and in terms of passive exclusion.
4) media is not a toy. We have to try children (and adults) a teach responsible use of media. Who makes videos spread of perpetrators of contributing to the next rampage.
alcohol is addictive. That is why we give our children do not. Some computer games have also a potential for addiction. But why do we allow uncontrolled play 12 or more on the computer?
computers are just like little children in full beer bottles. What if I already do (not computer beer bottle ;-)), then I have to make as a parent for a reasonable use of the medium ... Just as cell phones
should be regularly inspected by the parents. Join
5th). Only if enough people these proposals represented will change something.
It is our society, it is our children.
to ARD it goes here
to ZDF's here
going to mirror it here .
goes to FAZ it here
were now also made numerous members of parliament to the article carefully. This is best here.
contributions to the (next) rampage
I had announced. In this video, the gunman Tim K shot on camera . I could have found no better example and it can hardly . Believe
No computer game is ever dull a person as much as these pictures!
The price for the outstanding contribution to the (next) massacre has been given to Spiegel Online! You are now finally reached the level of the Bild newspaper.
The bloody trail of running amok
image building after the shooting spree.
Thank you for your contribution to the image (next) run amok!
The screams, the blood, the dead girl - The shock of the surviving students
Thank you for your contribution to the evening newspaper (the next) run amok!
(Note the comment " How do the media in the blood of the victims suhlen.Widerlich)
student describes death of her classmates
Netplosiv Thank you for your contribution to the (next) run amok!
put out during his blood rush from Tim Kretschmer the lives of 15 people ...
Thank Märkische General for your contribution to (another) rampage!
The massacre in the news ticker
Focus Online Thanks for your contribution to the (next) run amok!
gunman was "completely normal, containing (with photo series on the rampage) T-Online
Thanks for your contribution to the (next) rampage
Feature rampage
ZDF Thank for your contribution to (another) rampage
Thanks Big Brother, I'm a superstar Me Out of Here, Wife Swap and all other "release formats" for your contribution to the (next) rampage!
I suspect that a significant proportion of people with lie gun ownership at home at least one weapon in the bedroom have. If I had arms I'd keep it so that I have them handy when I need it should sometimes ....
But all agree that gun laws should not be tightened.
But why we are now discussing about computer games?
You can see it fine on the change of names.
Games -> Shooter game / Ego-Shooter -> Killer game
And is suddenly no longer the weapon to blame, but the computer game.
The fact is, for most people so incomprehensible that it the apparent reasons are no longer seriously questioned or even constructed like Prof. Dr. reasons. In his search for reasons grabs at a straw man, offering him. The best example of the proliferation of fake Internet message by Baden-Wuerttemberg Interior Minister Heribert Rech
is How to explain such acts quite well
to find an explanation is really not that difficult.
A (congenital) Depression
Our emotions such as fear, sorrow, love, joy, hatred, are fundamental characteristics of being. Only through them that we really feel, that we are alive. A person who is in located in a depression, lives most of the time in an emotionless state. In this state, it simply does not matter whether he lives or not. This can be increased up to the hatred of life. It is a contempt of life.
In my circle I know of including a child who suffers at age 12 from severe bulimia. As a small child striking already in therapy for years, you must now be fed to the probe. She was beaten or abused and they still have other siblings, one of which is otherwise not a single behavioral problems. Without medical help, they would already be dead, you will not live. Therapies in such cases to be limited.
Now it no longer really need much.
a Haßobjekt
Inevitably, each looking into the situation for the reason. Popular human guilt object "are always everyone else." People with depression are necessarily less socially acceptable. The exclusion should not even be actively pursued.
And if I hate my own life and "you" are responsible for my Sitation what I mean as your life?
Now you need "only" ...
a weapon
not work without it
and ....
why we will see another run at a school said
On the day of the massacre me a girlfriend from Peru to the incident and expressed deep regret. Will you try to understand these acts definitively, it is best if you do not ask, as usual, the motives of the perpetrator. Clearly it is when you ask yourself what has achieved the perpetrator to the crime ....
For by all broadcasters and newspapers to bring nationally and internationally for weeks on nothing but the shooting spree, discuss the new policy, laws, and everyone talks about it in the first place, we provide the platform for such acts.
For it is in the actions of only one thing: Once in a lifetime the focus of international public attention.
It is simply a cruel form of Selbstinzenierung. And we are the target audience.
And as long as the audience join in so beautiful, we will often see such killing sprees. Next time probably with even more bloody deaths. I bet soon the first pictures or videos will be made live in a killing spree, appear somewhere on the net.
What distinguishes those who look at documentaries on the massacre or the image acquired by a newspaper Autobahngaffer?
He's not on the highway.
We have now with Big Brother & Co. accustomed to our television in the private life of people want that we do not find it even more unusual when a man on camera shoots .
But from the perspective of those with similar thoughts as the shooter, we do so the gunman as a model, heroes and martyrs. In other words.
* We make ourselves our own madmen
* We are a part of the problem.
As you can see there have been already pretty competitive. Such acts are now intensively planned and prepared. Who has the coolest video of the rampage, who has the coolest outfit who has the most weapons, there are bombs handicrafts, and of course the main question:
who kills the most?
solutions
1) A I think would be a useful measure coverage that is limited to the facts. No pictures, no cover, no detailed reports, no documentation, no program changes.
could there be given a voluntary undertaking by the media. This could only be difficult for the media in which the stoking fears is at the core of their business model (in my opinion, the best example: Bild-Zeitung).
2) arms are not in private households. The argument put forward by Ms Zypries that the storage of weapons in shooting clubs, they can be interesting and a slump object not understand me. Already stored in every clubhouse enough weapons to equip a small army. Then there must be very strict requirements for the storage of weapons. For fire safety regulations but also HERE.
also of the proposal by Angela Merkel , gun owners in the future to control notice I do not believe. Are we now employ weapons inspectors in 1000, the rumreisen in the Republic and control the correct storage of weapons in private households? We then perform a weapons possession tax must pay one or the majority?
There are also such a thing as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of the . Without a court search warrant does not enter a weapons inspector without asking for accommodation. That is, if I had not properly secured my arms, I let the controller do not just clean. End of debate.
3) children's awareness in relation to exclusion. Active exclusion (bullying) should not be tolerated by all in the education of the people involved. But the children should be sensitized and in terms of passive exclusion.
4) media is not a toy. We have to try children (and adults) a teach responsible use of media. Who makes videos spread of perpetrators of contributing to the next rampage.
alcohol is addictive. That is why we give our children do not. Some computer games have also a potential for addiction. But why do we allow uncontrolled play 12 or more on the computer?
computers are just like little children in full beer bottles. What if I already do (not computer beer bottle ;-)), then I have to make as a parent for a reasonable use of the medium ... Just as cell phones
should be regularly inspected by the parents. Join
5th). Only if enough people these proposals represented will change something.
It is our society, it is our children.
to ARD it goes here
to ZDF's here
going to mirror it here .
goes to FAZ it here
were now also made numerous members of parliament to the article carefully. This is best here.
contributions to the (next) rampage
I had announced. In this video, the gunman Tim K shot on camera . I could have found no better example and it can hardly . Believe
No computer game is ever dull a person as much as these pictures!
The price for the outstanding contribution to the (next) massacre has been given to Spiegel Online! You are now finally reached the level of the Bild newspaper.
The bloody trail of running amok
image building after the shooting spree.
Thank you for your contribution to the image (next) run amok!
The screams, the blood, the dead girl - The shock of the surviving students
Thank you for your contribution to the evening newspaper (the next) run amok!
(Note the comment " How do the media in the blood of the victims suhlen.Widerlich)
student describes death of her classmates
Netplosiv Thank you for your contribution to the (next) run amok!
put out during his blood rush from Tim Kretschmer the lives of 15 people ...
Thank Märkische General for your contribution to (another) rampage!
The massacre in the news ticker
Focus Online Thanks for your contribution to the (next) run amok!
gunman was "completely normal, containing (with photo series on the rampage) T-Online
Thanks for your contribution to the (next) rampage
Feature rampage
ZDF Thank for your contribution to (another) rampage
Thanks Big Brother, I'm a superstar Me Out of Here, Wife Swap and all other "release formats" for your contribution to the (next) rampage!
0 comments:
Post a Comment